As a final post on my vacation trip, though I've already been home a week, I wanted to recap a few other elements of my trip that aren't so easily shoehorned into Commune/Empire type discussions.
First observation is that I've never seen such eager photogues as Stuart and Dan. Reference the
pictures on all sides.
On balance, Dan preferred taking pictures of the exteriors of Paris and statuesque nudity(left), while Stuart
preferred interiors and painted flesh (right).
It must be said, however, in defense of cameras, that Paris is also an example of the power of urban planning. I think you could say that the spaces of the city (and by the city I mean the old city in the center, not the expanded city with its massive suburban infrastructure-described slums) are designed and maintained with a fastidiousness bordering on pathology. This is obviously in large part for the benefit tourists like us (and especially our revenue stream), but I think it is just as much an obsession with the conservation of a (chosen) historical past and its symbols and a general aesthetic or way of living that considers beauty as an augmenting force for quality of life.
For example, one has the distinct impression after spending some time exploring Paris that whenever there is a moment of hesitation on zoning or construction the solution that presents itself to city planners is: build a park.
And not just a park, a park with impeccable attention to detail down to the composition of each flower bed and immaculately maintained by early morning crews of gardeners and trimmers. Notice the details highlighted by night lighting and the painstaking preservation of any valued symbol
or monument. During my first week in Montmartre I found it amazing the quantity of couples amorously smooching around every perfect little corner, but when you have created such beautiful spaces there are emotional consequences for your inhabitants!

But the thing that legitimized the trip in terms of its real purpose was the cache of documents on Archbishop Darboy and everything about him at the Archbishopric of Paris. I wasn't expecting this to be the most important stage of my research, and so I left it until the last three days. But while the previous week I had spent far too much time reproducing documents sometimes only tangentially related to the topic I wanted to pursue, the archivist at the Archbishopric began by bringing me eight massive stringed boxes filled and overflowing with the precious nectar of valued information. Pictures, articles, journals, newspaper clippings, all of it extremely relevant and usable. I think I shall have to return finish grabbing all of the loot!
I had been prepared for the highly proprietary and suspicious nature of Catholic archives. My advisor had experience great suspicion and constant observation when she penetrated such a
sanctum, many expecting that her research would yield yet another broadside against Catholic power or perversity. But instead I found total graciousness and open hands. The best part was when the sweet little Abbe took me on the last day to the lobby and pointed out a cell door. It was a door that had been removed from the cell of a fellow prisoner of Darboy, also a priest. Both men were taken, during the death throes of the Commune, to another prison (La Roquette), and soon after they were executed on a smoky night - the clouds red with reflected fire from the burning city. A desperate act of vengeance by the order of one man in the absence of a government that was at that moment being summarily executed. When I asked the Abbe why the death of Darboy was not more heavily commemorated in other monuments (outside of Notre Dame). He replied "France went left, we [Catholics] went right." When France, on its way to abolishing the death penalty in 1981, finally destroyed La Roquette prison in the 1970s they had to decide what to put in its place. Guess what they decided? That's right, a park. A more fitting use of space is difficult to imagine.
No comments:
Post a Comment